jump to navigation

“Practicing TM, Copyright, IP & Related Areas of Law”: Amanda Schreyer Speaking at BPLA Event 09/18/2017

Posted by Morse Barnes-Brown Pendleton in Attorney News, Events, Intellectual Property.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

AES Headshot Photo 2017 (M1117143xB1386)Intellectual property attorney Amanda Schreyer will speak at the Boston Patent Law Association’s “Making Connections in Boston’s IP Community” event on October 18. Amanda will speak on the panel “Practicing TM, Copyright, IP & Related Areas of Law,” which will discuss pathways to practices as an IP lawyer in various settings. The panel discussion will be of particular interest to law students, recent law school graduates, STEM students, and others interested in intellectual property law careers.

The panel will be held from 5:00-6:30pm at District Hall in Boston’s Innovation District. View the event page for more information and to register.

MBBP Welcomes Intellectual Property Attorney Amanda Schreyer as Counsel 08/23/2017

Posted by Morse Barnes-Brown Pendleton in Attorney News, Computer Software & Hardware, Games & Interactive Entertainment, Intellectual Property, Internet and E-Commerce, MBBP news, Publishing & Media.
Tags: , , , , ,
add a comment

AES Headshot Photo 2017 (M1117143xB1386)We are pleased to announce the addition of Intellectual Property Counsel Amanda Schreyer.

Amanda will continue to concentrate her practice on privacy and data security, licensing and strategic alliances, trademark, and transactional matters. Schreyer’s clients include video game and software developers, digital influencers, media publishers, influencer marketing agencies and other intellectual property holders.

Amanda regularly advises clients on such matters as sweepstakes and contest rules and regulations, native advertising and sponsored content, and FTC endorsement and disclosure requirements. She has substantial experience negotiating film, television, and book deals, and is very knowledgeable about talent collective bargaining agreements. Amanda prosecutes trademarks at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and also advises creative entrepreneurs in connection with a variety of transactional matters.

We invite you to contact Amanda directly.

Matal v. Tam: The Supreme Court Rejects the Prohibition on Disparaging Trademarks 06/22/2017

Posted by Morse Barnes-Brown Pendleton in Attorney News, Intellectual Property.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

Sean D. Detweiler (SDD)By: Sean Detweiler and Bianca Sena

On Monday June 19, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the U.S. Trademark Office’s denial of registration for “disparaging” trademarks under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment and is therefore unconstitutional. The case, Matal v. Tam (previously known as Lee v. Tam) concerned the federal trademark registration of “The Slants,” an all Asian-American rock band. The Court affirmed the Federal Circuit’s decision that Section 2(a) constituted viewpoint-based discrimination because it necessarily required a subjective value judgment on whether something is “disparaging.” The decision upended a portion of statute that has been in place since 1946. The decision will likely impact a parallel trademark case, Pro Football Inc. (a.k.a., the Redskins case), which involves the same disparagement clause section of the Lanham Act and cancellation of the Redskins trademark registrations.

For further detail, read “Matal v. Tam: The Supreme Court Rejects the Prohibition on Disparaging Trademarks”. For more information on trademarks, please contact Sean Detweiler.

%d bloggers like this: