Our Life Sciences team has published the Summer 2017 edition of its Vector newsletter. Below you will find brief descriptions of the news and articles included in the publication. Read the full newsletter for more information.
CORPORATE PARTNER MIKE JABBAWY PARTICIPATING ON SHOOBX STARTUP PANEL
On September 26, corporate partner Mike Jabbawy will take part in the panel “How to Start a Startup.” The panel is part of Shoobx’s Startup Series, which features real life stories from startup founders, investors, and community members. More information and how to register for the event can be found on page 1.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ATTORNEY AMANDA SCHREYER JOINS MBBP AS COUNSEL
Intellectual Property attorney Amanda Schreyer joined the firm as Counsel. Amanda focuses her practice on licensing and strategic alliances; trademarks and copyrights; and privacy and data security. Read more about Amanda’s practice.
MORE MONEY FOR LIFE SCIENCES?
A new legislative proposal to provide a five-year, $500 million life sciences initiative was recently announced by Governor Charlie Baker. This initiative would extend the current 10-year, $1 billion initiative that is set to expire at the end of the next fiscal year and would continue to be managed by the Massachusetts Life Sciences Center. More information about the proposal can be found on page 1.
SANDOZ INC. v. AMGEN INC.: SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES BPCIA PROVISIONS
On June 12, 2017, the United States Supreme Court issued its first ruling on two key provisions of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (“BPCIA”) concerning the resolution of patent infringement suits in connection with the submission to the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) of applications to commercialize biosimilars in the United States. Read more about the case implications.
LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORP. v. PROMEGA CORP.
On February 22, 2017, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Life Technologies Corp. v. Promega Corp., a case focused on interpreting the patent infringement statute which creates liability for exporting a component of a patented invention. Read the full article for more information.
TC HEARTLAND LCC v. KRAFT FOODS GROUP BRANDS LLC
In TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, the Supreme Court unanimously held that 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) is the exclusive provision controlling venue in patent cases, and that under this provision a corporation “resides” only in the state of incorporation. Continue reading for more information about the case.
THE MINUTIAE OF CORPORATE MINUTES?
Young entrepreneurs and corporate associates of emerging companies frequently ask: “How detailed should Board of Directors meetings’ minutes be?” The short answer is: Do not delve into minutiae, other than precision for approval of equity issuances, option grants and material contracts. More guidance on corporate minutes can be found starting on page 4.
CLIENT SPOTLIGHT: CRISTCOT LLC
Cristcot LLC is a global life sciences company focused on the development and commercialization of unique drug delivery systems, combination products, and specialty drug formulations that improve the quality of patient care. Read the full spotlight on page 6.