jump to navigation

Does a Reverse Triangular Merger Constitute An Assignment by Operation of Law? 03/12/2013

Posted by Morse, Barnes-Brown Pendleton in Corporate, Legal Developments.
Tags: ,
trackback

By: Joe Marrow

Corporate Attorney Joseph MarrowIn a Delaware Court of Chancery decision dated February 22, 2013, Vice Chancellor Parsons held that a reverse triangular merger does not constitute an assignment by operation of law under Delaware law.  The decision, Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC v. Roche Diagnostics GMBH, C.A. No. 5589-VCP (Del. Ch. 2013) helped to clarify some uncertainty created by the same court in an earlier decision involving the same parties.  As a result of the decision, M&A practitioners should feel more comfortable that Delaware courts will find that a reverse triangular merger will not be considered an assignment by operation of law when interpreting a contract.

Read the full article.

For more information on this and other M&A topics, please contact Joe Marrow.

Comments»

No comments yet — be the first.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: